In terms of go fast there is not a comparison between a 90 Yamaha and a 90 merc. If they are stock motors the merc will win every time
In terms of go fast there is not a comparison between a 90 Yamaha and a 90 merc. If they are stock motors the merc will win every time
Last edited by Griffin; 09-26-2016 at 05:57 AM.
Seeing these soulless vanilla ice lookin Yankees on a bassboat is worse than watching a woman get her implants taken out. It's just wrong. Get back in your Lund and go back to infisherman.
Powertech. Night and day with my triton.
Me too
"Hunt today to kill tomorrow." - Ron Jolly
Never forget this piece of work..
A possible explanation
Last edited by rutbuck; 09-26-2016 at 03:58 PM.
Literally word for word what he said. Ask wetreed. He has owned the same hull with both motors.
I will say the 90 Yamaha is easier to mod and make faster overall but stock vs stock on the same hull a 90 merc is gonna smoke a 90 Yamaha.
And don't turn this into a ford vs Chevy pissing contest. I own 2 yamahas, a merc and even a mudbuddy.
Last edited by Griffin; 09-26-2016 at 04:21 PM.
Seeing these soulless vanilla ice lookin Yankees on a bassboat is worse than watching a woman get her implants taken out. It's just wrong. Get back in your Lund and go back to infisherman.
I just wanted to know your reasons, considering the Yamaha has 2.0 gears and merc has a slower 2.33:1 ratio
Seeing these soulless vanilla ice lookin Yankees on a bassboat is worse than watching a woman get her implants taken out. It's just wrong. Get back in your Lund and go back to infisherman.
So in terms of your glitter boats, a 1.62 Mercury lower unit wouldn't have an advantage over a 2.0 gear? I'd disagree, a 2.0 ratio with its proper pitched prop will require more hp to turn than a 1.62 and its equivalent prop
Didn't realize we were talking about glitter boats. So why don't all glitter boats run 1.62s?
I have owned 1.62s and 1.75s have you?
Seeing these soulless vanilla ice lookin Yankees on a bassboat is worse than watching a woman get her implants taken out. It's just wrong. Get back in your Lund and go back to infisherman.
Yeah and The 1.62 will be faster than the 1.75. Just like the 2.0 vs the 2.33. The physics still apply
Last edited by Gone South; 09-26-2016 at 06:05 PM.
Yep now I know you haven't owned both and have officially added you to the moondick list
Last edited by Griffin; 09-26-2016 at 06:05 PM.
Seeing these soulless vanilla ice lookin Yankees on a bassboat is worse than watching a woman get her implants taken out. It's just wrong. Get back in your Lund and go back to infisherman.
So what were the numbers you saw with both 90s on the same hull?
I'm not saying that I owned one tman
I have however owned a pad hull flats boat with 1.62s and 1.75s. It ran 72 with the 1.62s and 78 with the 1.75s.
There is a few more variables involved in your physics there turbo
Seeing these soulless vanilla ice lookin Yankees on a bassboat is worse than watching a woman get her implants taken out. It's just wrong. Get back in your Lund and go back to infisherman.
Bookmarks