Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Rants win reprieve

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wateree, South Carolina
    Posts
    48,865

    Default Rants win reprieve

    COLUMBIA, SC – The double-crested cormorant – a type of bird hated by many South Carolina fishermen – gained an ally Wednesday that could protect the species from federally sanctioned hunting efforts in the Palmetto State.

    A U.S. court in Washington suspended two federal orders that have allowed South Carolina and other states to authorize the mass killing of cormorants.

    The big birds are blamed for devouring so many fish that some say they are making it difficult for anglers at lakes Marion and Moultrie southeast of Columbia. In 2014 and 2015, South Carolina hunters killed 25,000 cormorants suspected of gobbling fish.

    Wednesday’s court ruling does not have an immediate effect on South Carolina because cormorant hunts are over for the year. The program, which began two years ago, allows hunters to shoot cormorants for several weeks during the winter. Cormorants are otherwise protected by federal law.

    But Robert McCullough, a spokesman with the S.C. Department of Natural Resources, said the court decision may spell the end of mass cormorant hunts in South Carolina.

    “We’ve got time to reassess, and that is what we are looking at,’’ he said. “Today, we could not have a cormorant season’’ because of the ruling.

    Double-crested cormorants are dark, fish-eating birds with wingspans of more than two feet. They are native to South Carolina.

    Wednesday’s court decision was in response to a legal challenge by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, an organization that represents federal natural resource agency workers.

    The group argues in court documents that cormorants are not the threat to important fish that many people make them out to be. Cormorants, rather than eating up prized game fish, tend to eat more invasive species, the group says.

    The court said Wednesday that suspending the federal killing orders won’t hurt the environment, but it will save cormorants until more study can be conducted. The court in March ordered the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to come up with a plan to address the issue.

    “It goes without saying that if these orders are left in place, additional cormorants will be killed,’’ Judge John Bates wrote.

    Laura Dumais, an attorney for the public employees organization, said her group is pleased with the court ruling. The issue centered on whether the program could go forward with what her group said were limited environmental studies. It’s possible the cormorant killing programs could be re-approved if studies justify them.

    “We see this as extremely important,’’ she said. “States or tribes have been killing birds without scientific justification for doing so. We are very encouraged the court has ended this and required the science to be done.’’

    Read more here: http://www.thestate.com/news/local/a...#storylink=cpy

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bonneau Beach
    Posts
    12,475

    Default

    The group argues in court documents that cormorants are not the threat to important fish that many people make them out to be. Cormorants, rather than eating up prized game fish, tend to eat more invasive species, the group says.
    Where is their scientific data on this claim? I never saw a grass carp come out of any like I did bream and bass.
    Quote Originally Posted by BigBrother View Post
    I can eat a bowl of alphabet soup and shit out a thought process better than the vast majority of you clemmings.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    24,581

    Default

    Chuck Ruth sent out a survey and they made the determination on responses from that survey.
    You've got one life. Blaze on!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,639

    Default

    There are enough pictures floating around of bream and bass in their throats to prove that theory wrong.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bonneau Beach
    Posts
    12,475

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squatty View Post
    Chuck Ruth sent out a survey and they made the determination on responses from that survey.
    I didn't get one. Must of been a Controlled Study.
    Quote Originally Posted by BigBrother View Post
    I can eat a bowl of alphabet soup and shit out a thought process better than the vast majority of you clemmings.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    In the Swamp
    Posts
    2,214

    Default

    PEER was the group with Trout Unlimited that shut down the upper Telico OHV a few years ago. They do not need facts or studies. Their whole argument against us was the petroleum levels and sediment from the trails were choking out the native brown trout from their spawning area. The problem with this is everything done after we were kicked out worsened the water quality. The native trout's spawning areas were dwindling tho. The culprit was the rainbows that TU stocked in the river so the anglers would have something to catch.

    Fuck PEER and Fuck TU.
    NBK II - Killing is our business and business is good!

    Quote Originally Posted by sprigdog View Post
    no. violating it would be enough. taxidermists are too expensive.
    Quote Originally Posted by 2thDoc View Post
    heck, I'll play. If we took away your ability to type, I might not want to punch you in the mouth so much for being stupid.
    Quote Originally Posted by River Hawk View Post
    tits like an old beagle dog

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,708

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squatty View Post
    Chuck Ruth sent out a survey and they made the determination on responses from that survey.


    I didn't get a survey

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •