Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: FTC bans Non Compete clauses

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carolina Counsel View Post
    It is not good news for capitalism. Medicine is one of the few spaces where I might argue there is a public policy reason not to allow noncompetes. Just more big government interference.
    I find it good for capitalism. Screw big business trying to keep their thumb on their employees.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Greenville
    Posts
    4,838

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Remy View Post
    I find it good for capitalism. Screw big business trying to keep their thumb on their employees.
    I disagree, obviously. Non-competes are not just for "big business," they're often a necessity for small businesses, particularly those in specialized fields that share their trade secrets with employees (yes, I know that you can still protect trade secrets absent a noncompete). A business often invests a lot of time and energy (at an initial loss) into training its employees and instilling industry-specific knowledge to that employee. The business reasonably wants to protect its investment. One way to do so is by way of noncompete. The law already states that a noncompete is unenforceable if not accompanied by consideration, so employees are required to receive something in exchange for signing a noncompete. It's up to that employee to determine whether the juice is wroth the squeeze.
    Carolina Counsel

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •