Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 30

Thread: More Bullshit

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    538

    Default More Bullshit




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Pawleys Island
    Posts
    35,969

    Default

    SC lawmakers need to just tell the feds we’ll manage our fishermen and their catches out of our ports. SAFMC managing the NC/Va border to the Keys as one fishery is absolutely stupid.
    Yeah, but do you consider a dog to be a filthy animal? I wouldn't go so far as to call a dog filthy but they're definitely dirty. But, a dog's got personality. Personality goes a long way.


    You might take out a dozen before they drag you from your home and skull fuck you to death. Marsh Chicken 6/21/2013

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    11,112

    Default

    Have no fear your post will shortly be moderated in that it chastises the "federal narrative". Let's dont worry about that.

    I have no idea what the annual harvest should be.

    But I know I damn sure trust you so called red neck, imbeciles, or deplorable's before I ever would trust some idiot wearing a .gov badge. Who has never even seen the ocean much less actually fished.

    This crap is ridiculous.

    Obviously we are far better stewards of the land and sea than they are but now we cant even navigate the waters due to morons in the federal government telling us what we should do!
    Yup, he's crazy...


    like a fox. The dude may be coming in a little too hard and crazy but 90% of everything he says is correct.

    Sort of like Toof. But way smarter.
    ~Scatter Shot

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Murrells Inlet
    Posts
    2,312

    Default

    Where do the numbers come from? Extrapolate from boats at the ramp?

    Never been checked except by DNR.

    What should that number be in lbs?

    Should commercial close if they close rec? I think so. Should we manage state by state? Or NC/SC/GA? Florida access makes it a different animal.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ballard's Landing
    Posts
    15,432

    Default

    I'd wager that SC's grouper fishery is highly under fished by 80% of recreational crews.
    Be proactive about improving public waterfowl habitat in South Carolina. It's not going to happen by itself, and our help is needed. We have the potential to winter thousands of waterfowl on public grounds if we fight for it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Edisto/Camdenshire
    Posts
    8,415

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BOGSTER View Post
    I'd wager that SC's grouper fishery is highly under fished by 80% of recreational crews.
    80% is probably pretty ambitious.
    Quote Originally Posted by walt4dun View Post
    Monsters... Be damned if I'd ever be taken alive by the likes of faggot musslims.
    Quote Originally Posted by 2thDoc View Post
    I am an equal opportunity hater.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    12,314

    Default

    I’m sure they are gonna say the same thing that they said about ARS. Basically, number are fine but the breeding stock is not at the level it should be and is the direct result of discard. If you don’t think there are people who want a complete shutdown of bottom fishing during certain times just wait. Guarantee electric reels will be on the docket at some point.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Pawleys Island
    Posts
    35,969

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BOGSTER View Post
    I'd wager that SC's grouper fishery is highly under fished by 80% of recreational crews.
    Don’t forget the ARS, Golden Tiles, Red Porgy etc. The size of the fishery lumped under the SAFMC’s purview is ridiculous, Florida alone should be managed in 3 separate zones NC, SC and Ga are much more alike. Add in rec closures while commercial remains open, it all adds up to lobbies and money.
    Yeah, but do you consider a dog to be a filthy animal? I wouldn't go so far as to call a dog filthy but they're definitely dirty. But, a dog's got personality. Personality goes a long way.


    You might take out a dozen before they drag you from your home and skull fuck you to death. Marsh Chicken 6/21/2013

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Sharks are killing more grouper and ARS than any rec fishermen.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    May River
    Posts
    7,347

    Default

    well sounds like the gags will end up like an american red on my bottom trips...
    you aint did a dawg gon thang until ya STAND UP IN IT!- Theodis Ealey


    Quote Originally Posted by Rebel Yell View Post
    The older I get, the more anal retentive I get.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,445

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scdiver View Post
    Where do the numbers come from? Extrapolate from boats at the ramp?

    Never been checked except by DNR.

    What should that number be in lbs?

    Should commercial close if they close rec? I think so. Should we manage state by state? Or NC/SC/GA? Florida access makes it a different animal.
    Commercial quote was cut down to 300 pound trip limit on grouper. That does not include 200 pound snowy trip limit.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Charleston
    Posts
    3,309

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by b35w View Post
    If you don’t think there are people who want a complete shutdown of bottom fishing during certain times just wait. Guarantee electric reels will be on the docket at some point.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I’d be cool with a shutdown in certain areas for spawning redfish…

    I’m not fully up to date with the offshore stuff but One of the big issues with reef fish is relatively high release mortality to account for. I will say the redfish stock is way down and you can still catch plenty, catch and population health are not mutually inclusive.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    12,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernWake View Post
    I’d be cool with a shutdown in certain areas for spawning redfish…

    I’m not fully up to date with the offshore stuff but One of the big issues with reef fish is relatively high release mortality to account for. I will say the redfish stock is way down and you can still catch plenty, catch and population health are not mutually inclusive.
    I’ve heard mortality numbers as high as 70 or 80%. To me it makes absolutely zero sense if you acknowledge that number to have a zero fish limit. Your acknowledging that the fish are going to die anyway, so why in the world would you not allow anglers to keep one or two a day. I promise you they’re not stop fishing the area just because they can’t keep red snapper. It just means they’ve got apick through them. And I bet compliance with descending devices is very low.

    Where I fish, the redfish population has never been more healthy.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Charleston
    Posts
    3,309

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by b35w View Post
    I’ve heard mortality numbers as high as 70 or 80%. To me it makes absolutely zero sense if you acknowledge that number to have a zero fish limit. Your acknowledging that the fish are going to die anyway, so why in the world would you not allow anglers to keep one or two a day. I promise you they’re not stop fishing the area just because they can’t keep red snapper. It just means they’ve got apick through them. And I bet compliance with descending devices is very low.

    Where I fish, the redfish population has never been more healthy.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Do you open the season year round and let every one that hits the rail (or first x number) be kept or do you account for that mortality affect open season?

    Statewide numbers/data show a strong trend to the contrary. Much of that shows a decrease in recruitment/spawning related (going off my memory of the last presentation I sat through). Again catching fish does not mean the stock is as healthy as it could be/has historically been.
    Last edited by SouthernWake; 03-20-2024 at 09:42 AM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    12,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernWake View Post
    Do you open the season year round and let every one that hits the rail (or first x number) be kept or do you account for that mortality affect open season?

    Statewide numbers/data show a strong trend to the contrary. Much of that shows a decrease in recruitment/spawning related (going off my memory of the last presentation I sat through). Again catching fish does not mean the stock is as healthy as it could be/has historically been.
    Catching young fish (and a lot of them) means they are reproducing. The science being presented does not match the OVERWHELMING feedback given from the people that actually spend time on the water.

    Again, if they acknowledge that mortality rate is high, it is ridiculous to have a zero bag limit acknowledging 7 out of 10 fish are going to die. Either close it completely or let people keep 2 fish during the time most people bottom fish. There would be virtually zero net change to mortality.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    179

    Default

    Lets ask the Japanese what the framework should look like.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    12,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pluffmudder View Post
    Lets ask the Japanese what the framework should look like.
    Yeah, they have it down to a science for sure


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Summerville
    Posts
    2,457

    Default

    Fillet knife sales will be booming!
    If you give 10 people a bag of gold, someone will complain about how heavy it is!

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    538

    Default

    And new limit, one per person 2 PER BOAT


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Pawleys Island
    Posts
    35,969

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flopduster View Post
    And new limit, one per person 2 PER BOAT


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    3 tags with license annually. Buy up to 5/10 more at $X.00/ea. Steep fine for an untagged fish.
    Yeah, but do you consider a dog to be a filthy animal? I wouldn't go so far as to call a dog filthy but they're definitely dirty. But, a dog's got personality. Personality goes a long way.


    You might take out a dozen before they drag you from your home and skull fuck you to death. Marsh Chicken 6/21/2013

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •