Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 154

Thread: Video-SCDNR Cat 1 WMA MISMANAGEMENT

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    26

    Default Video-SCDNR Cat 1 WMA MISMANAGEMENT

    Please watch the attached video. The collapse of Cat 1 WMA properties is not a funding issue, it is a management issue. Private landowners produce ducks year in and year out on shoestring budgets and without biologists(diplomas).
    You can make a difference! You can force change! At the end of this video are instructions on how to e-mail the General Assembly. Instead of commenting on this presentation,take that time to let your ELECTED representatives know your dissatisfaction. If the General Assembly will not help,then we need to VOTE for change.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Georgetown
    Posts
    2,651

    Default

    What is the end game here? Do you realize how much the state spends to provide you the taxpayer with duck hunting opportunities? If the general public knew these figures draw hunts would cease to exist! Guess what- maybe that is the result those behind the curtain want. As I’ve said before when is the state going to buy a fleet of sport fishing boats to take me on an offshore fishing trip? Apples to apples question!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    26

    Default

    The end game is to replace the DNR employees who have caused this disastrous collapse of Cat 1 WMAs. In the private sector they would have been replaced years ago.This starts with the Deputy Director and many of her staff. I am a private land owner. I manage 425 acres of wet soil ricefields 2 miles north of Samworth WMA. I know what it cost to manage one of these properties. With qualified managers,the cost to operate these Cat 1 WMAs would be pennies on the dollar. The state has allow unqualified staff to spend far more than it should to operate these Cat 1 WMAs and they have not harvested a duck in years. Unqualified staff is the problem.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    GREENWOOD
    Posts
    6,388

    Default

    So I’ve never hunted any state managed area before so my knowledge is extremely limited.

    But my question is how does the 3 Santee wma’s have 100% reduction in harvest since 2010?

    How have all 3 had exactly 0 duck harvests without them being completely closed and not allowing hunting? Or is that the case here?

    I can’t imagine if the areas were being hunted at all that the harvest would equal 0. Something would have been killed.
    Last edited by quack head 11; 01-13-2024 at 09:28 AM.
    I am a nobody, that met somebody, that can save anybody.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Georgetown
    Posts
    2,651

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quack head 11 View Post
    So I’ve never hunted any state managed area before so my knowledge is extremely limited.

    But my question is how does the 3 Santee wma’s have 100% reduction in harvest since 2010?

    How have all 3 had exactly 0 duck harvests without them being completely closed and not allowing hunting? Or is that the case here?

    I can’t imagine if the areas were being hunted at all that the harvest would equal 0. Something would have been killed.
    Not hunting

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Charleston
    Posts
    3,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bitesize View Post
    Not hunting
    Odd to factor that into the harvest data unless aiming to manipulate data…

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Irmo
    Posts
    4,254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernWake View Post
    Odd to factor that into the harvest data unless aiming to manipulate data…
    You mean not hunting an area and reporting the harvest as zero then using that in statistics to show a decline?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    26

    Default

    “0” ducks harvested is a measure of performance. “0”” being the lowest denominator..

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    26

    Default

    That is what this presentation is all about. There is “0” management and the Wildlife Division must be held responsible. We need change at the top and staff on these WMAs. The DNR board defends this poor performance. This would never be tolerated in the private sector.
    At the end of the video there are instructions on how to e-mail the General Assembly. Please ask them to intervene.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Camden
    Posts
    546

    Default

    While it is relative, “shoestring” is not the adjective most average tax paying citizens would use to describe the budget needed to manage the coastal impoundments called out in that video on an annual basis successfully. It’s not likely used to describe the budgets of successful private landowners near by either.
    Quote Originally Posted by Huntin Ace View Post
    You are exactly right sc sportsman

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    26

    Default

    By shoe string,I mean private landowner operate on a shoestring budget compared to DNR. This is only possible because private landowners have qualified managers. For the most part,DNR does not. The state should be embarrassed with amount of money spent to produce “0” ducks on many Cat 1 WMAs. They cannot do worse than “0”.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    26

    Default

    That is not a factual statement and you have no facts to base it on.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Georgetown
    Posts
    2,977

    Default

    I’m not going to watch the video but I assume that is the one Smith Ragsdale made and narrated. Since the release of that video there have been some pretty monumental steps taken at Samworth. They have been and will continue to do some very good work out there.

    As to the “shoestring budget” comment. There is not a plantation that is successful in managing ducks in that area with a budget of less than a million dollars a year and I can almost guarantee that! The most successful private plantation in that area might as well not even have a budget as much money as they spend on ducks. The average Joe that looks at this situation and tries to solve the issue has absolutely no bearing on what it takes to actually manage for and have ducks. The Upper Coastal Waterfowl Project has been and will remain the outlier in Public Land Waterfowl Management. The most important thing that anyone has to remember is that comparing private land management to public land management will only result in disappointment!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Conservation means the wise use of the earth and its resources for the lasting good of men. -Gifford Pinchot

    The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it. -Thomas Jefferson


    The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    26

    Default

    You could not be more wromg on the $1 million comment. Not one place. On the Pee Dee spennnds that annually. Or frankly anywhere close to that.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    26

    Default

    You have lost all credibility! You don’t have a clue as to what you are talking about. We spend Pennie’s on the dollar compared to DNR(government). Please before spewing misinformation,get your facts straight. For example, ever thing in Historic Ricefields YouTube presentation is truthful and factual. Numbers don’t lie.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Show me the ducks!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ballard's Landing
    Posts
    15,433

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dog Man View Post
    Show me the ducks!
    Come up and tour the Santee National Wildlife Refuge.

    I’ll show you more puddle ducks than you would ever believe.

    I understand the Santee Delta’s water problems.
    That is Santee Cooper’s fault alone. We should be following the rule curve and haven’t.
    Winter draw-downs would easily fix that……it did fix that from the 50s-90s.

    However, it doesn’t explain the ACE Basin.
    Properties with history of wintering 15k don’t have 500 birds.

    Where are the greenwings? Where are the gadwalls? Where are the shovelers? Where are the bluewings?

    The ACE had a tough year with the summer rains and corn.
    I get that. But widgeon grass held a pile of birds for decades before.

    The birds have adapted to corn up here.

    Clarendon County shouldn’t be holding shovelers, widgeon, and pintails in big numbers in January.
    We have greenwings, but in January they should be like gnats on every coastal plantation.

    I’m not deflecting from the fact that DNR needs a major reform on CAT1 WMAs, I’m just stating that waterfowl patterns have changed over the last 10 years.

    I can’t be the only one noticing this.
    Be proactive about improving public waterfowl habitat in South Carolina. It's not going to happen by itself, and our help is needed. We have the potential to winter thousands of waterfowl on public grounds if we fight for it.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Georgetown
    Posts
    2,651

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BOGSTER View Post

    I can’t be the only one noticing this.
    You’re not

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    11,116

    Default

    Where is the narrator from? He doesn't sound like a native SC person.
    Yup, he's crazy...


    like a fox. The dude may be coming in a little too hard and crazy but 90% of everything he says is correct.

    Sort of like Toof. But way smarter.
    ~Scatter Shot

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    FROG LEVEL
    Posts
    23,847

    Default

    Hunted Samworth the first year it was open to draw hunt. Never pulled the trigger and I was not the only one.
    Gettin old is for pussies! AND MY NEW TRUE people say like Capt. Tom >>>>>>>>>/
    "Wow, often imitated but never duplicated. No one can do it like the master. My hat is off to you DRDUCK!"

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •