OK IT IS ON. CLEMSON v USuC GAME

[Bigtimber2]

I don't enough faith in Roper's play calling. I think it has been sketchy at best and horrible most of the time.
Hopefully he will bring an on-side kick

When you don't have the talent to execute all playing calling looks bad.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

[TheVisorGuy]

When you don't have the talent to execute all playing calling looks bad.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

What size shoe you wear?

[Baggy]

Yep. Good call that was the champs last play last year, and they won.

[Catdaddy]

Clemson rolls in this one. The talent gap is too big. The loss of Samuel was big. SC would need 3 Samuels to hang with tater tech.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

[DRDUCK]

Bentley tries running the ball like the last 2 weeks it want be close. He will get hit like he ain't ever been hit. Just hope he does not get hurt.

[MDman]

Bentley will be hashtagging #MeToo on Sunday morning

[coot nasty]

I'm just glad Clemson is getting their DBs back. Also Lawrence, and Joseph back

[clembo3]

If Bentley has a good game things could be interesting. It will be interesting to see if our passing game actually has a pulse this week. It’s hard to put teams away with KB playing like he has been.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ecu1984]

KB will get picked at least once. The Coot backs do close in fast on a pass. One of their strengths this year.
I think the Coot D can hang with the Tater O but I don't think the Coot O can put up enough points against the goat fucker's defense
to win it. The biggest advantage the Coots will have is Dabo and home field.

[Jozie & Me]

I remember last year y'all tried to run the shovel pass because Pitt ran it. I expect Jakie to have on syracuse underroos and attempt hurry up offense.

I have no idea what will happen.

I hope it's a waffle stomp and Jakie is the turd.

[Bigtimber2]

South Carolina has an 8-3 record, the defense is playing better and the Gamecocks are grinding out wins. Their best win might be the season opener against N.C. State in a game that South Carolina won despite being limited to 31 yards rushing on 21 carries and being outgained 504-246. The Gamecocks capitalized on two big Wolfpack turnovers in earning the upset.

They have wins over Missouri (6-5), Louisiana Tech (5-6), Arkansas (4-7), Tennessee (4-7), Vanderbilt (4-7), and Florida (4-6). Two of those are in the midst of brutal seasons and have already fired their coaches (Tennessee and Florida) and Bret Bielema is on the hot seat at Arkansas. Missouri is playing better lately, and that win looks better than it did when it happened – that loss was the first of five in a row for Mizzou, and the Gamecocks scored 31 points. Mizzou gave up 43 the week before, and in the weeks after the loss to the Gamecocks gave up 35, 51, 40 and 53.

The Gamecocks have played four teams with a winning record (not including FCS foe Wofford) and lost three of those, the lone win coming over the Wolfpack in the opener.

Statistically speaking, the Gamecocks are abysmal offensively and a bit one-dimensional. They are 104th nationally in total offense (Clemson is 26th), 72nd in passing offense and 102nd in rushing offense. They are 88th in scoring offense.

Defensively, they are a little better. The Gamecocks are 43rd nationally in total defense (Clemson is 7th), 40th in run defense and 72nd in pass defense. They are 21st in scoring defense, however, giving up just 19.6 points per game. It is interesting to note that the Gamecocks haven’t faced but one Top 30 offense all season – Missouri – and have faced four offenses ranked 100th or lower.

Offensively, the Gamecocks have faced exactly one defense ranked higher than 38th and that is Georgia (5th).

The early betting lines have Clemson as a 13.5 point favorite. ESPNs FPI says Clemson is three touchdowns better than South Carolina. I tend to think the final score might fall somewhere in the middle of those two. You have to give South Carolina a ton of credit – the schedule hasn’t been tough, but they’ve managed to win the games they were supposed to win and one they weren’t. Clemson’s operating procedure against Power Five teams has been to get up early but fail to step on the throat of their opponent and at some point the score gets a little closer than it should be.

I don’t think the Gamecocks will be able to run effectively – they haven’t on anybody – which means?

https://www.tigernet.com/story/footb...proaches-16418






Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

[MKW]

South Carolina has an 8-3 record, the defense is playing better and the Gamecocks are grinding out wins. Their best win might be the season opener against N.C. State in a game that South Carolina won despite being limited to 31 yards rushing on 21 carries and being outgained 504-246. The Gamecocks capitalized on two big Wolfpack turnovers in earning the upset.

They have wins over Missouri (6-5), Louisiana Tech (5-6), Arkansas (4-7), Tennessee (4-7), Vanderbilt (4-7), and Florida (4-6). Two of those are in the midst of brutal seasons and have already fired their coaches (Tennessee and Florida) and Bret Bielema is on the hot seat at Arkansas. Missouri is playing better lately, and that win looks better than it did when it happened – that loss was the first of five in a row for Mizzou, and the Gamecocks scored 31 points. Mizzou gave up 43 the week before, and in the weeks after the loss to the Gamecocks gave up 35, 51, 40 and 53.

The Gamecocks have played four teams with a winning record (not including FCS foe Wofford) and lost three of those, the lone win coming over the Wolfpack in the opener.

Statistically speaking, the Gamecocks are abysmal offensively and a bit one-dimensional. They are 104th nationally in total offense (Clemson is 26th), 72nd in passing offense and 102nd in rushing offense. They are 88th in scoring offense.

Defensively, they are a little better. The Gamecocks are 43rd nationally in total defense (Clemson is 7th), 40th in run defense and 72nd in pass defense. They are 21st in scoring defense, however, giving up just 19.6 points per game. It is interesting to note that the Gamecocks haven’t faced but one Top 30 offense all season – Missouri – and have faced four offenses ranked 100th or lower.

Offensively, the Gamecocks have faced exactly one defense ranked higher than 38th and that is Georgia (5th).

The early betting lines have Clemson as a 13.5 point favorite. ESPNs FPI says Clemson is three touchdowns better than South Carolina. I tend to think the final score might fall somewhere in the middle of those two. You have to give South Carolina a ton of credit – the schedule hasn’t been tough, but they’ve managed to win the games they were supposed to win and one they weren’t. Clemson’s operating procedure against Power Five teams has been to get up early but fail to step on the throat of their opponent and at some point the score gets a little closer than it should be.

I don’t think the Gamecocks will be able to run effectively – they haven’t on anybody – which means?

https://www.tigernet.com/story/footb...proaches-16418

That's exactly what I'd expect to read on tigernet.
In games like these, I think you can almost throw stats out the widow...almost.
I tend to believe that Clemson will win this game, but I'm not convinced that it will be as lop-sided as it should be.

[ecu1984]

South Carolina has an 8-3 record, the defense is playing better and the Gamecocks are grinding out wins. Their best win might be the season opener against N.C. State in a game that South Carolina won despite being limited to 31 yards rushing on 21 carries and being outgained 504-246. The Gamecocks capitalized on two big Wolfpack turnovers in earning the upset.

They have wins over Missouri (6-5), Louisiana Tech (5-6), Arkansas (4-7), Tennessee (4-7), Vanderbilt (4-7), and Florida (4-6). Two of those are in the midst of brutal seasons and have already fired their coaches (Tennessee and Florida) and Bret Bielema is on the hot seat at Arkansas. Missouri is playing better lately, and that win looks better than it did when it happened – that loss was the first of five in a row for Mizzou, and the Gamecocks scored 31 points. Mizzou gave up 43 the week before, and in the weeks after the loss to the Gamecocks gave up 35, 51, 40 and 53.

The Gamecocks have played four teams with a winning record (not including FCS foe Wofford) and lost three of those, the lone win coming over the Wolfpack in the opener.

Statistically speaking, the Gamecocks are abysmal offensively and a bit one-dimensional. They are 104th nationally in total offense (Clemson is 26th), 72nd in passing offense and 102nd in rushing offense. They are 88th in scoring offense.

Defensively, they are a little better. The Gamecocks are 43rd nationally in total defense (Clemson is 7th), 40th in run defense and 72nd in pass defense. They are 21st in scoring defense, however, giving up just 19.6 points per game. It is interesting to note that the Gamecocks haven’t faced but one Top 30 offense all season – Missouri – and have faced four offenses ranked 100th or lower.

Offensively, the Gamecocks have faced exactly one defense ranked higher than 38th and that is Georgia (5th).

The early betting lines have Clemson as a 13.5 point favorite. ESPNs FPI says Clemson is three touchdowns better than South Carolina. I tend to think the final score might fall somewhere in the middle of those two. You have to give South Carolina a ton of credit – the schedule hasn’t been tough, but they’ve managed to win the games they were supposed to win and one they weren’t. Clemson’s operating procedure against Power Five teams has been to get up early but fail to step on the throat of their opponent and at some point the score gets a little closer than it should be.

I don’t think the Gamecocks will be able to run effectively – they haven’t on anybody – which means?

https://www.tigernet.com/story/footb...proaches-16418






Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

I agree with all of this and your post will make Dabo look even like more of a clown if Climp5in loses

[coot nasty]

These boys are ready!! Spot the damn ball

https://www.tigernet.com/story/footb...proaches-16418

[jwterry3]

I think it will be an ugly turn over filled game that Clemson wins by 10 or so.......CU def is legit but I am not scared at all of their O....Something like 31-21

I do love that we could completely fuck your playoff hopes tho

[coot nasty]

Glad bama and Auburn is 3:30.... Good football Saturday

[DRDUCK]

Damn right it is. We got the fire going and old time cooking on it. Stripers on a plank

[Catdaddy]

Clemson wins this game and by how much is not important. Wisconsin is the real deal and will end up with a playoff spot,....so will Oklahoma, and the SEC. The is only one spot left.......Miami or Clemson?

It's really looking more like Miami with tater tech home watching the playoffs just like SC.



Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

[Jozie & Me]

Clemson wins this game and by how much is not important. Wisconsin is the real deal and will end up with a playoff spot,....so will Oklahoma, and the SEC. The is only one spot left.......Miami or Clemson?

It's really looking more like Miami with tater tech home watching the playoffs just like SC.



Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

That will be decided on Dec 2.

But here are a couple of questions.

Lets say.....

Auburn beats Bama by a field goal.

Auburn beats UGA so a 2 loss SEC champ.

Does Bama get in like 31-0hio state did?

Then

Clemson beats Miami by a Field goal

Does 1 loss Miami get in?

[TheVisorGuy]

How Wisconsin is not in the top 4 right now baffles me